What Is the Digital Lab Notebook?

Excerpt from a Leonardo da Vinci notebook

Learn about the Digital Lab Notebook. Like a scientist's written account before the digital age, it records the means and circumstances of the capture of digital information from a “real world” subject, tracking all the events associated with the processing of this information into a digital representation. More…


DLN Tool Suite

Download the Digital Lab Notebook Tools

CHI has released Beta versions of the first two tools in the Digital Lab Notebook software suite to simplify the collection and management of scientifically reliable metadata. Learn more and download the tools.


Related Project: The Democratization of Scientific Imaging through Metadata Management and Archival Submission Support

This CHI project is funded by a Preservation and Access Research and Development grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities, beginning January 2018. The project supports the development and enhancement of internationalized open source software tools for the collection, management, archiving, and sharing of cultural heritage imaging data and associated metadata. More…

“METS and the CIDOC CRM—A Comparison”

METS Schema subset

Subset of a METS schema from an Appendix in this publication

About This Publication

Author Martin Doerr, Head of the Centre for Cultural Informatics of the Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas
Publication Date February 2011
PDF File Download the white paper (3.1 MB)

Abstract

This technical white paper compares the functional roles of the two standards for metadata encoding and the management of interoperability and information integration in heterogeneous, distributed digital library environments. These standards are: CIDOC CRM (the Conceptual Reference Model of the International Committee for Documentation of the International Council of Museums); and METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard). The paper investigates the ways in which both standards can be optimally used in combination. The report calls upon managers and practitioners to support decisions about the deployment of these standards and to serve as guides for the effective use of both standards. The paper was commissioned and financed by Cultural Heritage Imaging with majority funding from the US Institute of Museum and Library Services' (IMLS) National Leadership Grant Program (Award Number LG-25-06-0107-06). Additional funding was provided by charitable contributions to Cultural Heritage Imaging.